Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm
Sigma
85 종합 점수
vs
Pentax DA 21987 35mm
Pentax
42 종합 점수
점수
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Landscape
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm | Pentax DA 21987 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 6 |
| Groups | 6 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | PENTAX Super Protect (SP) coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | 22★ |
| Min Aperture | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 6 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-M | Pentax K |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.28 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 49 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 300 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.14★ | 0.17x |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pentax DA 21987 35mm
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average aperture (25th percentile)
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm0.162달러당 점수
vs
Pentax DA 21987 35mm0.234달러당 점수
Pentax DA 21987 35mm 1.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
