Sony a6700 a6700 Black 2025
Sony
92 종합 점수
vs
Kodak PIXPRO AZ405 AZ405 White
Kodak
18 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Wedding Events
Photography
Product Photography
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Video
Streaming
Vlogging
Youtube
사양
| Sony a6700 a6700 | Kodak PIXPRO AZ405 AZ405 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | aps-c | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 26 MP★ | 20.68000030517578 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 100 |
| Processor | BIONZ XR | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | PhotoPhase Detection: 759VideoPhase Detection: 495 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 11 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 120 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | 1/2000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 240 fps★ | 30 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | XAVC HS, XAVC S-I | Motion JPEG, Linear PCM (Monaural) |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | ✗ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.44 kg |
| Battery Life | 550 shots★ | 300 shots |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C★ | USB-2.0 |
| HDMI | Micro HDMI★ | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | ✗ |
장단점
Sony a6700 a6700 Black 2025
- Strong af (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong burst (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (27th percentile)
Kodak PIXPRO AZ405 AZ405 White
- Below average af (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
가격
Sony a6700 a6700 Black 20250.068달러당 점수
vs
Kodak PIXPRO AZ405 AZ405 White0.090달러당 점수
Kodak PIXPRO AZ405 AZ405 White 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony a6700 a6700
Scores 92 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 24 of 33 specs.
