HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver
HP
55 総合スコア
vs
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2 Black
Lenovo
69 総合スコア
スコア
Compact
Student
Business
Entertainment
Developer
Creator
Gaming
スペック
| HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a | Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 5 230 | AMD Ryzen 7 7735U★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 6 | 8★ |
| Frequency | 3.5 GHz★ | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | AMD Radeon 760M | AMD Radeon 680M |
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 512 GB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 1920 px |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 62.5% sRGB | 45% NTSC |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet RJ-45 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.40 kg★ | 1.81 kg |
| Battery | 56 Wh★ | 47 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
長所と短所
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver
- Strong compact (78th percentile)
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Strong cpu (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average storage (26th percentile)
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2 Black
- Strong social proof (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong reliability (78th percentile)
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (77th percentile)
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average compact (25th percentile)
価格
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver0.050ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2 Black0.061ドルあたりのスコア
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2 Black 1.2倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen2
Scores 69 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 27 specs.
