Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens Review

The Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S is the king of convenience, landing in the 86th percentile for versatility. But its slower f/4 aperture and average optics mean it's a jack-of-all-trades, master of none.

Focal Length 24-70mm
Max Aperture f/4
Mount Nikon Z
Stabilization Yes
Weather Sealed No
Weight 499 g
Lens Type Zoom
Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens lens
70 Score global

Overview

The Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S is a kit lens that punches above its weight. It lands in the 86th percentile for versatility, which is its main selling point. That 24-70mm range covers most of what you'll shoot day-to-day, from wide landscapes to tighter portraits, all in a compact package.

But you're making some clear trade-offs for that convenience. Its constant f/4 aperture sits in the 29th percentile, so it's not a low-light champ. And its optical performance is just average, sitting in the 34th percentile. This isn't the lens you buy for stunning bokeh or tack-sharp corner-to-corner detail, but it's a solid, reliable workhorse.

Performance

Let's talk numbers. That 86th percentile versatility score is the headline. It means this lens can handle more situations than most zooms in its class. But the other scores tell the real story. Its autofocus is middle-of-the-road at the 47th percentile, so it's reliable but not lightning fast. It has no stabilization (39th percentile), so you'll rely on your camera body for that. And for close-up work, forget it. Its macro score is in the 17th percentile, so you'll need a dedicated macro lens for that.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.1
Bokeh 27
Build 53.9
Macro 86.5
Optical 35.8
Aperture 30.2
Versatility 85.4
Social Proof 91.8
Stabilization 87.5

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely versatile zoom range (86th percentile) covers wide-angle to portrait lengths. 92th
  • Constant f/4 aperture keeps exposure consistent while zooming. 88th
  • Compact and lightweight design for a full-frame zoom, great for travel. 87th
  • New optical formula aims for sharpness with minimal distortion. 85th
  • A sensible, do-everything lens for a Z-mount camera kit.

Cons

  • Slower f/4 aperture (29th percentile) struggles in low light and limits background blur. 27th
  • No image stabilization (39th percentile), relying solely on in-body systems. 30th
  • Average optical performance (34th percentile) won't wow pixel-peepers.
  • Poor macro capability (17th percentile) for close-up shots.
  • Build quality is just average (39th percentile), lacking weather sealing.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 70

Aperture

Max Aperture f/4
Constant Yes

Build

Mount Nikon Z
Weight 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 70

Value & Pricing

Here's the kicker: the price is all over the map. You can find this lens for as low as $555 or as high as $897, a $342 spread. At the lower end, it's a compelling value as a versatile kit lens. But if you're looking at prices near $900, you should seriously consider if a faster prime lens or a higher-end f/2.8 zoom might serve you better. Shop around, because the right vendor makes a big difference here.

749 €

vs Competition

Compared to the prime lenses in its competitor list, like the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 or Meike 55mm f/1.8, you're trading speed for range. Those primes have apertures in the 80th+ percentile for low light and bokeh, but you're stuck at one focal length. The Nikon gives you flexibility. Against other zooms, its f/4 aperture is the main limitation. If you need better low-light performance from a zoom, you'll have to step up to a heavier, more expensive f/2.8 model. This lens wins on convenience and portability, not outright optical prowess.

Verdict

This is a classic 'good enough' lens. If you're a new Z-mount shooter who wants one lens to learn on and travel with, and you find it for around $600, it's a sensible choice. Its versatility is legit. But if you're chasing image quality, love shooting in dim light, or want creamy background separation, you'll outgrow it quickly. The data is clear: it excels at being a convenient tool, not a spectacular one.