Samsung
Samsung
12 Score global
vs
Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026
Acer
66 Score global
Scores
Entertainment
Developer
Student
Business
Compact
Creator
Gaming
Spécifications
| Samsung | Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | — | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Pas de données | |
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| Frequency | — | 1.4 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | Intel Arc Graphics★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Pas de données | |
| Type | — | integrated★ |
| VRAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | — | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 16" |
| Resolution | — | 1920 px★ |
| Panel | — | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | — | 350 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 2 x HDMI | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | — | 1.60 kg★ |
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Samsung
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong reliability (78th percentile)
- Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average port (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average ram (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Strong cpu (76th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average compact (34th percentile)
Prix
Samsung
No current pricing available
Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026
Verdict
Gagnant: Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL
Scores 66 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 27 specs.
