Sigma fp fp L

Sigma fp fp L

Sigma
48 Score global
vs
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black

Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black

Kodak
14 Score global

Scores

Product Photography
Sigma
59
Kodak
15
Photography
Sigma
58
Kodak
5
Streaming
Sigma
57
Kodak
20
Beginner
Sigma
53
Kodak
15
Sports Wildlife
Sigma
52
Kodak
4
Video
Sigma
49
Kodak
11
Wedding Events
Sigma
47
Kodak
5
Travel
Sigma
46
Kodak
12
Youtube
Sigma
45
Kodak
11
Vlogging
Sigma
41
Kodak
6

Spécifications

Sigma fp fp LKodak PIXPRO AZ255
Sensor
Typeback-illuminated CMOSCMOS
Sizefull-frame1/2.3-inch
Megapixels61 MP16.350000381469727 MP
ISO Range100100
Autofocus
AF Points499
AF TypePhase Detection: 49
Eye AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)10 fps
Max Shutter1/80001/2000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution4K1080p
4K FPS30 fps
1080p FPS120 fps30 fps
10-bit
Log Profile
RAW Video
CodecH.264, CinemaDNGH.264/MOV
Display & EVF
Screen Size3.2"3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution3.7M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.38 kg0.34 kg
Battery Life240 shots280 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-CMicro-USB (USB 2.0)
HDMIMicro HDMIMicro HDMI
Hot Shoe

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma fp fp L

  • Strong evf (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong sensor (72th percentile)
  • Strong video (70th percentile)
  • Strong af (67th percentile)
  • Below average battery (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black

  • Below average af (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile

Prix

Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black

No current pricing available

Verdict

Gagnant: Sigma fp fp L

Scores 48 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 14 of 30 specs.

Sigma fp fp L Meilleur pour:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

A considérer aussi