ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ 65" Review
The ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ is a 65-inch 4K HDR beast that wants to be your only screen. It's incredible for a dedicated room, but its price and size make it impractical for almost everyone else.
The 30-Second Version
The ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ is a 65-inch 4K beast that blends a gaming monitor and a premium TV. Its HDR performance with 1000 nits and G-Sync Ultimate is top-tier, and the size is utterly immersive. However, prices soar from $8,000 to $12,000, making it a luxury purchase for dedicated media/gaming rooms. For most people, a separate big TV and a dedicated gaming monitor is a smarter, cheaper choice.
Overview
Alright, let's talk about the ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ. This isn't just a monitor, it's a 65-inch 4K TV that's pretending to be a monitor, and honestly, it's pretty convincing. It's built for the person who wants their gaming and media setup to be a single, massive focal point. You're not just buying a screen, you're buying a wall of pixels that can do 144Hz refresh rates and full-blown HDR. What makes it interesting is that it straddles two worlds: it has the raw specs of a high-end gaming monitor, but the sheer size and connectivity of a premium home theater display.
Performance
The numbers here are strong. A 144Hz refresh rate at 4K is still a demanding target, and this panel hits it, landing in the 75th percentile for performance in our database. That means smooth, fast-paced gaming is absolutely on the menu. The real magic, though, is in the HDR. With 384 independent LED zones for local dimming and a peak brightness of 1000 nits, this thing is certified for DisplayHDR 1000. In real terms, that means highlights pop, shadows are deep, and games or movies that support HDR look genuinely stunning. The 4ms response time is solid for a VA panel of this size, keeping motion clear without too much smearing.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Unmatched size and immersion: The 65-inch 4K display is basically a best-in-class canvas for gaming and media. 99th
- Top-tier HDR performance: The 1000-nit brightness and 384-zone FALD backlight make HDR content look spectacular. 99th
- Excellent connectivity: With four HDMI ports and a DisplayPort, it can handle multiple consoles and a PC simultaneously. 94th
- G-Sync Ultimate ensures smooth gaming: This is the full, hardware-based G-Sync solution, eliminating tearing and stutter. 82th
- Color quality is among the best: The quantum-dot tech and wide DCI-P3 gamut produce rich, accurate colors.
Cons
- It's incredibly expensive: Prices range from over $8,000 to nearly $12,000. This is a luxury purchase.
- The power consumption is high: The 700W power rating means it draws a lot of electricity and needs serious cooling.
- It's not portable at all: This is a permanent fixture. Moving it requires planning and probably a friend.
- Ergonomics are basic: It's a VESA mount, but the sheer size limits where you can practically put it.
- The performance percentile is strong but not leading: For pure gaming speed, some smaller, specialized monitors are faster.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 65" |
| Resolution | 3840 (4K UHD) |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 4 |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Ultimate |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 1000 nits |
| HDR | HDR1000 |
| HDR Support | HDR1000 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 4 |
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| Speakers | Yes |
Ergonomics
| VESA Mount | 200x200 |
Features
| Power | 700 |
Value & Pricing
Let's be clear: the value proposition here is about aspiration, not practicality. The price swings wildly from about $8,038 to $12,163 across vendors, so shopping around is crucial. For the money, you're getting a unique hybrid product. It's not the best value for a pure gaming monitor, nor is it the best value for a 65-inch TV. But if you want a single device that does both at a very high level, and you have the space and budget, this is your option. There's no direct competitor at this exact size and spec combo, which explains the premium.
vs Competition
The closest competitors are all different. The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" is a super-wide, dual-resolution beast with similar HDR chops, but it's a different shape and experience. The LG UltraGear 45" offers an ultra-wide curved format for immersive gaming but at a lower resolution. The MSI MPG 32" and BenQ Mobiuz EX271U are traditional high-performance gaming monitors that are faster, cheaper, and easier to desk-mount, but they obviously don't offer the cinematic scale. The trade-off is simple: if you prioritize sheer screen area and a hybrid media/gaming hub, the PG65UQ is unique. If you want the highest refresh rates, more ergonomic flexibility, or a more dedicated gaming focus, the smaller competitors win.
| Spec | ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ 65" | MSI MPG MSI 32" UHD 4K 240Hz G-Sync Compatible 0.03ms | Samsung Odyssey Neo Samsung - 57" Odyssey Neo G9 Dual 4K UHD Quantum | LG UltraGear LG UltraGear 45" WUHD DUAL MODE 4K 165Hz FHD 330Hz | BenQ Mobiuz BenQ MOBIUZ EX271U 27" 4K HDR 165 Hz Gaming | Dell UltraSharp Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" 4K HDR 120 Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65 | 32 | 57 | 45 | 27 | 31.5 |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 7680 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | OLED | VA | OLED | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 144 | 240 | 240 | 165 | 165 | 120 |
| Response Time Ms | 4 | 0 | 1 | - | 1 | 5 |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Ultimate | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium | - |
| Hdr | HDR1000 | HDR400 | HDR10+ | HDR10 | HDR10 | HDR |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Color | Compact | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ 65" | 99.2 | 40.8 | 93.8 | 82.4 | 63.1 | 74.6 | 98.9 | 45.9 |
| MSI MPG 32" Compare | 99 | 72.4 | 98.7 | 82.4 | 96.5 | 99.9 | 96.7 | 73.7 |
| Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" Dual Compare | 99.4 | 50.4 | 99.6 | 82.4 | 87.8 | 96.3 | 99.4 | 99.3 |
| LG UltraGear 45" Wuhd Dual Mode Compare | 99.8 | 82.7 | 99.6 | 97.2 | 93 | 70.2 | 98.1 | 99.3 |
| BenQ Mobiuz EX271U 27" Compare | 92 | 88.5 | 90.5 | 82.4 | 96.5 | 92.1 | 91.8 | 74 |
| Dell UltraSharp Dual 31.5" Compare | 97.6 | 72.4 | 90.5 | 82.4 | 87.8 | 58.3 | 97.2 | 90.6 |
Common Questions
Q: Can this monitor really replace both a high-end TV and a gaming monitor?
In terms of specs, yes. Its 1000-nit HDR1000 certification and 4K/144Hz performance check both boxes. However, its fixed size and high power draw mean it's best as a permanent fixture in a dedicated space, not a flexible desk monitor. For a living room TV and a desk gaming setup, separate devices are often more practical.
Q: How does the 4ms response time compare to faster gaming monitors?
A 4ms response time is solid, especially for a large VA panel. It's not the fastest—some IPS gaming monitors hit 1ms—but in our testing, it's well above average and sufficient for smooth gameplay without excessive motion blur. The trade-off for the size and HDR quality is reasonable.
Q: Is the G-Sync Ultimate worth it over other sync technologies?
G-Sync Ultimate is the full hardware-based version, which handles variable refresh rate smoothing at all frame rates, including low ones, and is required for the full HDR experience. It's a premium feature that ensures the best possible sync performance, but it only works with NVIDIA GPUs. For consoles using HDMI VRR, it's a different, but still effective, system.
Q: Why is the price range so wide, from $8,038 to $12,163?
This is a niche, low-volume product. Pricing varies drastically based on retailer stock, import costs, and regional availability. It's always worth checking multiple vendors, but even the lowest price is exceptionally high, reflecting its unique position as a hybrid display.
Who Should Skip This
You should skip this if you game at a desk. A 65-inch screen is not a desk monitor. You'll need to sit several feet away, and ergonomic adjustments are minimal. Competitive gamers who chase the highest refresh rates and fastest response times should also look elsewhere—smaller, dedicated monitors will serve you better. Finally, if your budget is under $5,000, skip it. You can assemble a fantastic 4K TV and a top-tier gaming monitor for far less money. Instead, look at the 32-inch or 45-inch gaming monitors from the competitor list, or pair a good 65-inch OLED TV with a separate 27-inch gaming monitor.
Verdict
If you're building a dedicated gaming room or a lavish home theater setup where you also play PC or console games, this monitor makes a compelling argument. It's a one-screen solution for high-end entertainment. The HDR is fantastic, the size is immersive, and the connectivity lets you hook up everything. For that specific, niche use case, it's a yes. But for almost everyone else, it's a hard no. If you're a competitive gamer who needs the fastest response, get a smaller, faster monitor. If you're a creative pro who needs color accuracy and ergonomics, get a professional display. If you just want a big TV for movies, get a TV. This product exists for a very specific, very well-funded corner of the market.