Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN | Review
The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 fills an ultra-wide niche for Sony shooters, but its average optics and missing features make the $1360 price hard to justify.
The 30-Second Version
The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 is a niche ultra-wide zoom with a constant aperture. It's versatile for its focal range, but optical performance is just okay and it lacks stabilization. At $1360, it's a tough sell unless you really need this exact combo.
Overview
The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN is a wide-angle zoom built for Sony's full-frame mirrorless cameras. It gives you that classic ultra-wide perspective with a constant f/2.8 aperture, which is great for landscapes, interiors, and creative shots where you want to get everything in the frame.
Our data shows it's a specialist, not an all-rounder. It scores decently for versatility but falls short in areas like macro and optical performance. For the price, you're paying for that specific focal range and aperture combo.
Performance
This lens lands in the 78th percentile for versatility, which is solid for a zoom. The constant f/2.8 aperture is a plus in low light. But the optical performance sits in the 35th percentile, and there's no image stabilization. So while it's flexible, the image quality isn't class-leading, and you'll need steady hands or a tripod for slower shutter speeds.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Constant f/2.8 aperture across the zoom range. 76th
- Solid versatility score for a wide-angle zoom.
- Covers a useful 14-24mm ultra-wide focal length.
- Decent build quality for the category.
Cons
- No image stabilization at all. 22th
- Optical performance is just average. 35th
- Macro capability is basically non-existent.
- Not weather-sealed, so keep it out of the rain.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 14 |
| Focal Length Max | 24 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
Value & Pricing
At $1360, this lens asks a lot for what it delivers. You're getting a specialized ultra-wide zoom with a good aperture, but you're missing stabilization and top-tier optics. If you absolutely need f/2.8 across 14-24mm on a Sony body, it's an option. But for that money, you might expect more polish.
vs Competition
Compared to the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8, you get a much wider field of view but lose a huge chunk of zoom range and Tamron's VC stabilization. Against the Sony 11mm f/1.8 (an APS-C lens), the Sigma is full-frame and zooms, but the Sony is sharper, cheaper, and has a faster aperture. The Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 is a completely different beast—a fast prime for portraits, not an ultra-wide zoom. This Sigma carves out a specific niche.
| Spec | Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN | | Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF | Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X | Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony | Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens | Nikon NIKKOR Z Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 14-24mm | 55mm | 35mm | 17-70mm | 24mm | 24-70mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/1.7 | f/2.8 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | - | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X | Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | false | true |
| Weight (g) | - | 281 | 400 | 544 | 272 | 676 |
| AF Type | - | STM | STM | Autofocus | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Lens Type | Zoom | - | - | Wide-Angle Zoom | Wide-Angle | Wide-Angle Zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN | | 46.4 | 48.4 | 37.9 | 21.7 | 34.6 | 54.6 | 75.5 | 37.9 |
| Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare | 95.6 | 81.8 | 81.1 | 89.1 | 67.5 | 88.1 | 37.5 | 87.8 |
| Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare | 95.6 | 73.6 | 63.4 | 93.2 | 74 | 80.5 | 37.5 | 87.8 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare | 46.4 | 59.2 | 64.3 | 77.4 | 90.8 | 54.6 | 92.5 | 87.8 |
| Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare | 46.4 | 81.8 | 87.6 | 81 | 82.5 | 75.8 | 37.5 | 99.9 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Compare | 46.4 | 71.6 | 72.1 | 72.4 | 97 | 54.6 | 85.4 | 87.8 |
Common Questions
Q: Is this lens good for video?
Our data gives it a 43.8/100 for video. The lack of stabilization hurts, but the constant f/2.8 and wide angle can be useful for static or gimbal shots.
Q: How sharp is it compared to other Sigma lenses?
Its optical performance percentile is only 35th, which is below average for lenses in our database. Don't expect it to be the sharpest tool in the shed.
Q: Can I use it for portraits?
It scores 43.3/100 for portraits. At 24mm and f/2.8, you can get some environmental shots, but it's not flattering for close-ups and the bokeh is just average.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need a general-purpose zoom or shoot handheld video. The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 gives you way more range and stabilization for less money. Also, if ultimate sharpness is your goal, look at prime lenses in this focal range.
Verdict
Buy this if you're a Sony shooter who lives in the ultra-wide world and needs f/2.8 for astrophotography or indoor events. It's a tool for a specific job. But if you want a walk-around lens, need stabilization, or prioritize razor-sharp optics, keep looking.