QCY H3
QCY
86 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Behringer HO HO 66
Behringer
15 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| QCY H3 | Behringer HO HO 66 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg★ | — |
| Ear Cushion | synthetic protein leather, slow spring memory foam | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | QCY H3 ANC Bluetooth Headphones Over Ear, Active Noise Cancelling Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with Microphones, Hi-Res Audio Sound, Multipoint Connection, 60H Playback, Custom EQ via App(White) | — |
| Surround | QCY H3 ANC Bluetooth Headphones Over Ear, Active Noise Cancelling Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with Microphones, Hi-Res Audio Sound, Multipoint Connection, 60H Playback, Custom EQ via App(White) | QCY H3 | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Cable Length | — | 2 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 3★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | QCY APP | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
QCY H3
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
Behringer HO HO 66
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
Preise
QCY H31.913Score pro Dollar
vs
Behringer HO HO 661.152Score pro Dollar
QCY H3 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: QCY H3
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
