Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Skullcandy Indy Evo

Skullcandy Indy Evo

Skullcandy
29 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
100
Skullcandy
33
Commute
Apple
96
Skullcandy
24
Travel
Apple
96
Skullcandy
26
Calls
Apple
94
Skullcandy
22
Fitness
Apple
91
Skullcandy
32
Gaming
Apple
81
Skullcandy
21
Music
Apple
75
Skullcandy
18

Spezifikationen

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/ASkullcandy Indy Evo
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsXXS, XS, S, M, L
Weight0.09 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamic
Drivers1
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBC
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive Audio
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
Multipoint
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Fast Charging5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening timeRapid Charge
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs30 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriassistant
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOSTile
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57IP55

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Skullcandy Indy Evo

  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Below average battery (25th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 30 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness