Samsung TH9
Samsung
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Cillso H97
Cillso
77 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Commute
Calls
Music
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Samsung TH9 | Cillso H97 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | semi-in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | semi-in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | s |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.09 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 14.199999809265137 mm★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 120 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 110 dB★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Built-In Voice Assistant, Microphone Included, Surround Sound, Volume Control, Waterproof |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Environmental Noise Cancellation |
| Transparency | ✗ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | ✗ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | Type-C fast charging |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | voice assistants |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | iOS, Android |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP7 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung TH9
- Strong comfort (70th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Cillso H97
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong mic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Preise
Samsung TH9
Cillso H97
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Cillso H97
Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 35 specs.
