BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

BEASTCOM
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA Black

MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA Black

MSI
76 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
BEASTCOM
57
MSI
75
Gaming
BEASTCOM
14
MSI
72
Workstation
BEASTCOM
46
MSI
71
Creator
BEASTCOM
22
MSI
70
Developer
BEASTCOM
44
MSI
68
Business
BEASTCOM
50
MSI
68
Compact
BEASTCOM
19
MSI
38

Spezifikationen

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA
Processor
CPU4.6 GHz ryzen_7AMD Ryzen™ 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
31,207
Cores88
Frequency4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPUIntegrated GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5060
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
20,798
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM8 GB8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 11 TB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD
Build
Form FactorTowermid-tower
PSU650W
Weight8.69 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports7
HDMIHDMI1x HDMI-out (2.1)
DisplayPort3x DP-out (1.4a)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBT 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

  • Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average port (25th percentile)

MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA Black

  • Strong storage (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong port (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Strong cpu (70th percentile)
  • Strong gpu (69th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA

Scores 76 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.

MSI Aegis Z2 A8NVL-1670CA Besser bei:

GamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation