FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra

Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra

Reolink
28 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video
FLATIC
39
Reolink
36
Product Photography
FLATIC
37
Reolink
21
Beginner
FLATIC
36
Reolink
35
Photography
FLATIC
36
Reolink
23
Streaming
FLATIC
26
Reolink
33
Wedding Events
FLATIC
33
Reolink
26
Youtube
FLATIC
31
Reolink
29
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
Reolink
27
Travel
FLATIC
23
Reolink
21
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
Reolink
20

Spezifikationen

FLATICReolink Argus Argus PT Ultra
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP8 MP
Autofocus
Subject Detection
Video
Max Resolution5K4K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg1.38 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB Type-A to USB Type-C

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC

  • Strong video (75th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra

  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: FLATIC

Scores 32 overall, wins 7 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 10 specs.

FLATIC Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeVloggingPhotographyWedding EventsProduct Photography

Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra Besser bei:

Streaming