Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue
Z CAM E2 E2
Bewertungen
Spezifikationen
| Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 | Z CAM E2 E2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 16 MP★ | 10.279999732971191 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 160 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 25★ | — |
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 6 fps | 120 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | ✗ | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | H.264, H.265, ProRes 422 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7"★ | 1.3" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.76 kg |
| Battery Life | 2000 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | USB 2.0 micro-B | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.0 |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue
- Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong build (69th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (68th percentile)
- Below average af (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
Z CAM E2 E2
- Strong burst (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong video (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong connectivity (76th percentile)
- Strong build (65th percentile)
- Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Fazit
Both products are closely matched — Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 wins 8 specs while Z CAM E2 E2 wins 7.