Apple EarflowPlus
Apple
35 Totaalscore
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
84 Totaalscore
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
Specificaties
| Apple EarflowPlus | TOZO Crystal Pods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | Rounded tip | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | Medium |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Foldable, Microphone Included | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Lightning | — |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play |
| Charging | Lightning | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 35 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | Lightning | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Other |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | iOS | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IPX5 |
Voor- & Nadelen
Apple EarflowPlus
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Strong build (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
Oordeel
Winnaar: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 36 specs.