Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016

Olympus
75 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ricoh Theta X

Ricoh Theta X

Ricoh
17 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Sports Wildlife
Olympus
80
Ricoh
15
Streaming
Olympus
77
Ricoh
9
Beginner
Olympus
76
Ricoh
16
Vlogging
Olympus
74
Ricoh
6
Youtube
Olympus
72
Ricoh
11
Travel
Olympus
72
Ricoh
14
Wedding Events
Olympus
71
Ricoh
14
Photography
Olympus
70
Ricoh
17
Product Photography
Olympus
69
Ricoh
15
Video
Olympus
68
Ricoh
14

Spezifikationen

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark IIRicoh Theta X
Sensor
TypeMOS
Sizemicro-four-thirds
Megapixels20.299999237060547 MP
ISO Range200
ProcessorTruePic VIII
Autofocus
AF Points
121
Keine Daten
AF TypeContrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)15 fps
Burst (Electronic)60 fps
Max Shutter1/16000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution4K
4K FPS30 fps
1080p FPS120 fps
10-bit
Log Profile
RAW Video
CodecH.264/MOV
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution2.4M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-C (USB 2.0)
HDMIMicro-HDMI
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong burst (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83th percentile)83th %ile

Ricoh Theta X

  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II

Scores 75 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 19 of 32 specs.

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography