Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"

Samsung
93 Overall Score
vs
Roku 4802CA

Roku 4802CA

Roku
21 Overall Score

Scores

Sports
Samsung
95
Roku
31
Budget
Samsung
93
Roku
20
Streaming
Samsung
91
Roku
29
Gaming
Samsung
90
Roku
23
Smart Home
Samsung
87
Roku
18
Movies
Samsung
86
Roku
30
Corporate
Samsung
83
Roku
19
Outdoor
Samsung
67
Roku
22
Portable
Samsung
66
Roku
16

Specifications

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"Roku 4802CA
Display
Size65"
Resolution8K3840 x 2160
Panel TypeMiniLEDRoku Ultra 4K/HDR/Dolby Vision S
BacklightMini-LED
Aspect Ratio16:9
Curved
Picture Quality
Color GamutNot Specified by Manufacturer
Motion TechMotion Xcelerator 165Hz
ProcessorNQ8 AI Gen2 Processor
HDR
HDR FormatsHDR10, HDR10+, HLGHDR, Dolby Vision
Dolby Vision
HDR10+
HLG
Gaming
Refresh Rate120 Hz
VRRFreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
ALLM
Game Mode
Smart TV
PlatformTizenRoku TV
Voice AssistantAmazon Alexa, BixbyHands-Free Voice Controls
Screen MirroringApple AirPlay
Audio
Speaker Config4.4.2
Wattage70W
Dolby Atmos
Surround SoundObject Tracking Sound+
eARC
Connectivity
HDMI Ports4
HDMI Version2.1
USB Ports2
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.3
Ethernet
Optical Audio
VESA Mount400 x 300 mm
Power & Size
Power316W
Energy Star
Weight25.60 kg

Pros & Cons

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong audio (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile

Roku 4802CA

  • Strong display (70th percentile)
  • Below average audio (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average gaming (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average smart (17th percentile)17th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 18 of 36 specs.

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65" Better at:

BudgetGamingMoviesSportsOutdoorPortableCorporateStreamingSmart Home