Moshi Moonrock in-Ear Headphones w/Compact Storage pod-

Moshi Moonrock in-Ear Headphones w/Compact Storage pod-

12 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

Scores

Calls
Moshi Moonrock
5
Technics
100
Travel
Moshi Moonrock
11
Technics
100
Budget
Moshi Moonrock
18
Technics
95
Music
Moshi Moonrock
15
Technics
94
Commute
Moshi Moonrock
10
Technics
92
Gaming
Moshi Moonrock
10
Technics
90
Fitness
Moshi Moonrock
13
Technics
84

Specifications

Moshi Moonrock in-Ear Headphones w/Compact Storage pod-Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form FactorIn-Earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.03 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Pros & Cons

Moshi Moonrock in-Ear Headphones w/Compact Storage pod-

  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average mic (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 37 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness