7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm

7Artisans
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm

Canon Retropia 32mm

Canon
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
7Artisans
55
Canon
35
Portrait
7Artisans
51
Canon
46
Professional
7Artisans
51
Canon
45
Video Cinema
7Artisans
41
Canon
50
Street
7Artisans
47
Canon
48
Budget
7Artisans
47
Canon
43
Travel
7Artisans
46
Canon
46
Landscape
7Artisans
46
Canon
33
Wildlife Sports
7Artisans
39
Canon
37

Spezifikationen

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mmCanon Retropia 32mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm32 mm
Elements11
Groups8
ED Elements2
Coatingnanocrystalline coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1611
Min Aperture0.9511
Constant
Diaphragm Blades12
Build
MountCanon RFCanon RF
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.05 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlymanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance370 mm1.50 m

Vor- & Nachteile

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm

  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (71th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon Retropia 32mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average macro (31th percentile)

Preise

Canon Retropia 32mm is 86 £ cheaper (2.5x less).

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm0.381Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm0.758Score pro Dollar

Canon Retropia 32mm bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm

Canon Retropia 32mm

Fazit

Gewinner: 7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm

Scores 54 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Canon Retropia 32mm Besser bei:

Video Cinema

Auch in Betracht ziehen