ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 2025

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 2025

ASUS
72 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel 17.3"

Intel 17.3"

Intel
14 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
ASUS
80
Intel
5
Creator
ASUS
80
Intel
8
Entertainment
ASUS
73
Intel
15
Developer
ASUS
71
Intel
12
Student
ASUS
67
Intel
12
Business
ASUS
67
Intel
12
Compact
ASUS
52
Intel
7

Spezifikationen

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16Intel 17.3"
Processor
CPURyzen 72 GHz others
Cores64
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050UHD Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
14,333
1,514
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM6 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR4
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Display
Size16"17.3"
Resolution1920 px
PanelIPSIPS
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports2
ThunderboltUSB4
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6WiFi 5
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.0
EthernetRJ45 Ethernet Port
Physical
Weight2.20 kg2.79 kg
Battery56 Wh
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 2025

  • Strong port (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong ram (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average compact (15th percentile)15th %ile

Intel 17.3"

  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong storage (69th percentile)
  • Below average compact (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average port (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average cpu (31th percentile)

Preise

Intel 17.3" is 979 £ cheaper (2.7x less).

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 20250.046Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel 17.3"0.025Score pro Dollar

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 2025 bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Black 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16

Scores 72 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.

ASUS TUF Gaming 16" A16 Besser bei:

GamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen