MSI Cubi N

MSI Cubi N

MSI
34 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

AOOSTAR
47 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Compact
MSI
34
AOOSTAR
52
Home Office
MSI
32
AOOSTAR
48
Business
MSI
36
AOOSTAR
46
Developer
MSI
18
AOOSTAR
40
Workstation
MSI
16
AOOSTAR
30
Creator
MSI
9
AOOSTAR
13
Gaming
MSI
5
AOOSTAR
6

Spezifikationen

MSI Cubi NAOOSTAR GEM12 MAX
Processor
CPU64 bit Quad-Core ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7
CPU Multi-Core Score
5,352
Keine Daten
Cores648
Frequency3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L3 Cache6 MB
Graphics
GPUUHD GraphicsRadeon 780M
GPU Benchmark Score
1,514
Keine Daten
Typeintegratedintegrated
VRAM TypeSharedShared
Memory & Storage
RAM4 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD
Build
Form FactorMinimini
PSU65W120W
Weight0.66 kg0.66 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports4
HDMI1 x D-Sub / 1 x HDMI 1.41x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.0
Wi-FiWiFi 5Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.2
EthernetRealtek RTL8111H2.5GbE
System
OSWindows 11 ProNo OS

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI Cubi N

  • Below average ram (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average storage (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average cpu (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average port (31th percentile)

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

  • Strong cpu (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong port (68th percentile)
  • Below average storage (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average gpu (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile

Preise

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

Scores 47 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 23 specs.

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX Besser bei:

CompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen