Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

Kodak
25 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Adesso Orbit D200

Adesso Orbit D200

Adesso
20 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Kodak
28
Adesso
12
Sports Wildlife
Kodak
25
Adesso
16
Beginner
Kodak
24
Adesso
19
Wedding Events
Kodak
24
Adesso
16
Photography
Kodak
20
Adesso
19
Video
Kodak
17
Adesso
16
Product Photography
Kodak
15
Adesso
17
Youtube
Kodak
14
Adesso
13
Streaming
Kodak
12
Adesso
10
Vlogging
Kodak
10
Adesso
7

Spezifikationen

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2Adesso Orbit D200
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Megapixels16 MP
Video
Max Resolution4K
1080p FPS30 fps
Display & EVF
Screen Size1.5"
Build
Weather Sealed

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

Adesso Orbit D200

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

Preise

Adesso Orbit D200 is 89 £ cheaper (2.0x less).

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue0.145Score pro Dollar
vs
Adesso Orbit D2000.235Score pro Dollar

Adesso Orbit D200 bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

Adesso Orbit D200

Fazit

Gewinner: Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2

Scores 25 overall, wins 6 of 10 usage categories and 2 of 6 specs.

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Besser bei:

TravelBeginnerVloggingStreamingWedding EventsSports Wildlife

Adesso Orbit D200 Besser bei:

Product Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen