Razer Blade Blade 14 Mercury White 2025
Razer
73 Pontuação geral
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 15.6" FA506NC-DS53 Graphite Black 2025
ASUS
56 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Ai Llm
Especificações
| Razer Blade Blade 14 | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 15.6" FA506NC-DS53 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Sem dados | |
| Cores | 10★ | 6 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 4.5 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | 4 GB |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6★ |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 15.6" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% sRGB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2★ | — |
| USB Ports | — | 3★ |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.63 kg★ | 2.30 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh★ | — |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Prós e Contras
Razer Blade Blade 14 Mercury White 2025
- Strong screen (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 15.6" FA506NC-DS53 Graphite Black 2025
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
- Strong gpu (73th percentile)
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average compact (28th percentile)
- Below average port (32th percentile)
Preços
Razer Blade Blade 14 Mercury White 2025
No current pricing available
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 15.6" FA506NC-DS53 Graphite Black 2025
Veredito
Vencedor: Razer Blade Blade 14
Scores 73 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.
