Behringer HO HO 66
Behringer
15 종합 점수
vs
Uliptz Wireless
Uliptz
76 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Studio
Gaming
Music
Work
Commute
Calls
사양
| Behringer HO HO 66 | Uliptz Wireless | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | — |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.18 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | memory foam |
| Headband | — | metal |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | Uliptz Wireless Bluetooth Headphones, 65H Playtime, 6 EQ Sound Modes, HiFi Stereo Over Ear Headphone with Microphone, Foldable Lightweight Bluetooth 6.0 Headphones (Silver) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | 2 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 65 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10-minute charge gives 4 hours of play |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
장단점
Behringer HO HO 66
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
Uliptz Wireless
- Strong comfort (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong battery (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
가격
Behringer HO HO 662.011달러당 점수
vs
Uliptz Wireless1.158달러당 점수
Behringer HO HO 66 1.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Uliptz Wireless
Scores 76 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
