Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27

Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27

Fujifilm
28 Gesamtbewertung
vs
FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
33 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video
Fujifilm
19
FLATIC
40
Product Photography
Fujifilm
23
FLATIC
38
Photography
Fujifilm
24
FLATIC
37
Beginner
Fujifilm
30
FLATIC
37
Wedding Events
Fujifilm
19
FLATIC
33
Youtube
Fujifilm
18
FLATIC
31
Sports Wildlife
Fujifilm
19
FLATIC
26
Streaming
Fujifilm
16
FLATIC
25
Travel
Fujifilm
17
FLATIC
24
Vlogging
Fujifilm
12
FLATIC
23

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27FLATIC
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27

  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average display (25th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

FLATIC

  • Strong video (76th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average display (25th percentile)
  • Below average burst (28th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Preise

Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27

FLATIC

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: FLATIC

Scores 33 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.

FLATIC Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography