Samyang Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II Lens for Sony E-Mount Review

The Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II delivers beautiful bokeh but struggles with slow, noisy autofocus. At $649, it's a tough sell when better all-around options exist.

Focal Length 35mm
Max Aperture f/1.4
Mount Sony E
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 658 g
AF Type Autofocus
Samyang Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II Lens for Sony E-Mount lens
72.7 Totaalscore

The 30-Second Version

Buy this lens only if you're obsessed with f/1.4 bokeh on a budget and can live with mediocre autofocus. For everyone else, the Sigma 35mm f/2 or Sony 35mm f/1.8 are smarter buys that won't leave you frustrated.

Overview

The Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II is a lens that feels like it's trying to be two things at once, and it's not entirely successful at either. The one thing you need to know is this: you're buying it for the f/1.4 aperture and the potential for beautiful bokeh, and you're tolerating everything else. It's a classic 'fast fifty' equivalent for full-frame Sony shooters, but our data shows it's a niche tool, not a do-it-all lens. It's built for low-light and shallow depth-of-field work, and if that's your jam, keep reading. If you need a lens that's great at everything, look elsewhere.

Performance

Let's talk about the surprise, and it's not a great one. The autofocus lands in the 46th percentile in our database. That's below average, and it shows. For a lens that costs $649, you'd expect snappy, reliable AF, especially for street or portrait work where that f/1.4 focus plane is razor-thin. We're hearing from users that it can hunt in low light, and the motor isn't the quietest. On the flip side, the optical performance at f/1.4 is surprisingly decent for the price—it's sharp in the center, and the bokeh quality is in the 91st percentile. So, the lens delivers where it absolutely has to (the image), but stumbles on the modern convenience (the focus).

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.3
Bokeh 91.2
Build 58.3
Macro 65.5
Optical 83.6
Aperture 88.3
Versatility 37.5
Social Proof 59.7
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Strong bokeh (91th percentile) 91th
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile) 88th
  • Strong optical (84th percentile) 84th
  • Strong macro (66th percentile) 66th

Cons

The Word on the Street

0.0/5 (3 reviews)
🤔 Owners love the image quality and bokeh at f/1.4, but many are frustrated by the autofocus performance, calling it slow or noisy in practice.
👍 A contingent of users are thrilled with the value, getting pro-level background blur for hundreds less than a Sony GM lens.
👎 There's notable confusion and annoyance around firmware updates and compatibility, with some users just returning the lens out of frustration.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 11
Groups 9
Coating UMC

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.4
Min Aperture f/16
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Sony E
Format Full-Frame
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs
Filter Thread 67

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 290
Max Magnification 1:5.55

Value & Pricing

At $649, the value proposition is shaky. You're paying a premium for the f/1.4 aperture in a native Sony mount. The optical results can be great, but you're making sacrifices in AF performance, portability, and features like weather sealing. If your budget is tight and you must have f/1.4, it's an option. If you can live with f/1.8 or f/2, you can get a better all-around lens for the same money or less.

Price History

€ 500 € 600 € 700 € 800 € 900 € 1.000 16 mrt19 mrt22 mrt22 mrt22 mrt29 mrt € 597

vs Competition

You have to look at the Sony 35mm f/1.8 and the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN. The Sony is more expensive, but it's lighter, has better autofocus, and includes optical stabilization. For most people, it's the better daily driver. The Sigma is similarly priced, sharper across the frame, has better build quality with weather sealing, and its autofocus is in a different league. The Rokinon only wins if your absolute top priority is that extra 2/3 of a stop of light from f/1.4 and you're on a strict budget. Even then, consider a used first-party lens.

Common Questions

Q: Is the autofocus really that bad on a Sony A7III?

It's not 'bad' in the sense that it fails, but it's definitely slower and noisier than a native Sony or Sigma lens. For single-shot portraits, it's fine. For continuous AF or video, you'll notice it struggling.

Q: What's the deal with Rokinon vs. Samyang?

They're the same company. This lens is identical to the Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AF II. Just buy whichever brand is cheaper or has the better warranty where you live.

Q: Should I get this or the Sony 35mm f/1.8?

Get the Sony. It's more money, but you're paying for vastly better autofocus, image stabilization, lighter weight, and peace of mind. The Rokinon's f/1.4 advantage isn't worth the trade-offs for most people.

Who Should Skip This

If you're a hybrid shooter who does video, a traveler who values a light kit, or anyone who needs dead-reliable autofocus for moving subjects, this isn't it. Go get the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN instead. It's sharper, better built, sealed, and focuses like a dream.

Verdict

We can't give this a full-throated recommendation. It's a lens for a very specific photographer: someone who shoots mostly static subjects in controlled or low-light environments, values bokeh quality above all else, and doesn't rely on fast or silent autofocus. For everyone else—especially hybrid shooters, travelers, or anyone needing reliable AF—the competition from Sigma and Sony is just better. This lens feels like a previous generation, and at this price, that's hard to justify.