Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
Audio-Technica
54 종합 점수
vs
Meze LIRIC Liric2
Meze
37 종합 점수
점수
Studio
Music
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Calls
사양
| Audio-Technica ATH-WP900 | Meze LIRIC Liric2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.24 kg★ | 0.43 kg |
| Ear Cushion | synthetic leather | Leather |
| Headband | synthetic leather | Adjustable Headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | planar magnetic |
| Driver Size | 53 mm | 92 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 50 kHz | 92 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 61 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | Audio-Technica ATH-WP900 Closed-Back Dynamic Portable On-Ear Wooden Headphones with Detachable A2DC Cables, Flamed Maple | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Transparency | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.2000000476837158 m | 1.2999999523162842 m |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✗ |
| NC Mic | — | ✗ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
장단점
Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong comfort (79th percentile)
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
Meze LIRIC Liric2
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Below average comfort (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
가격
Audio-Technica ATH-WP9000.090달러당 점수
vs
Meze LIRIC Liric20.018달러당 점수
Audio-Technica ATH-WP900 5.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
Scores 54 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 3 of 29 specs.
