XOSDA LS450
XOSDA
27 종합 점수
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Gaming
Calls
Studio
사양
| XOSDA LS450 | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.36 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | leather | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | Dynamic Driver |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Codecs | 2 Pack Kids Headphones for School Classroom Students, Wired Headphones Durable Class Set Earphones for Children Toddler Teens Boys Girls and Adult (LS450, Green+Orange) | JBL Tune 770NC - Adaptive Noise Cancelling with Smart Ambient Wireless Over-Ear Headphones, Bluetooth 5.3, Up to 70H Battery Life with Speed Charge, Lightweight, Comfortable & Foldable Design (Black) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
장단점
XOSDA LS450
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
가격
XOSDA LS4500.247달러당 점수
vs
JBL Tune 770NC0.857달러당 점수
JBL Tune 770NC 3.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 31 specs.
