EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
EarFun
92 종합 점수
vs
Sennheiser IE 900
Sennheiser
26 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
사양
| EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ | Sennheiser IE 900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | s | Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 7 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 5 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 48 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3, LE Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2 hours playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 54 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | EarFun Audio App | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | — |
장단점
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sennheiser IE 900
- Below average sound (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
가격
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+1.148달러당 점수
vs
Sennheiser IE 9000.019달러당 점수
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ 60.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 37 specs.
