AOC AGON Q27G4ZD
AOC
32 総合スコア
vs
MSI Raider 18" A2XWIG-014US Core Black
MSI
77 総合スコア
スコア
Creator
Gaming
Entertainment
Developer
Business
Student
Compact
スペック
| AOC AGON Q27G4ZD | MSI Raider 18" A2XWIG-014US | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core 7 240H | Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 10 | 24★ |
| Frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 36 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop GPU★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | データなし | |
| Type | — | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | — | 64 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | — | 4 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Storage 2 | — | 2 TB★ |
| Storage 2 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 18" |
| Resolution | — | 3840 px★ |
| Panel | OLED★ | Mini-LED |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 110.2% DCI-P3, 147.6% sRGB | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 3★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 x2 | v2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | BT 5.4★ |
| Ethernet | — | GB LAN (Up to 2.5G) |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 6.60 kg | 3.60 kg★ |
| Battery | — | 100 Wh★ |
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
長所と短所
AOC AGON Q27G4ZD
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong cpu (77th percentile)
- Strong screen (76th percentile)
- Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average compact (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average port (12th percentile)12th %ile
MSI Raider 18" A2XWIG-014US Core Black
- Strong screen (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong storage (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong port (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ram (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average compact (1th percentile)1th %ile
価格
AOC AGON Q27G4ZD
No current pricing available
MSI Raider 18" A2XWIG-014US Core Black
結論
勝者: MSI Raider 18" A2XWIG-014US
Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 32 specs.
