Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5"

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5"

Samsung
96 Overall Score
vs
Roku 4802CA

Roku 4802CA

Roku
31 Overall Score

Scores

Sports
Samsung
95
Roku
37
Streaming
Samsung
93
Roku
37
Budget
Samsung
92
Roku
36
Smart Home
Samsung
89
Roku
26
Movies
Samsung
86
Roku
33
Gaming
Samsung
85
Roku
26
Corporate
Samsung
84
Roku
22
Portable
Samsung
71
Roku
22
Outdoor
Samsung
68
Roku
24

Specifications

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5"Roku 4802CA
Display
Size65"
Resolution8K4K
Panel TypeMiniLEDRoku Ultra 4K/HDR/Dolby Vision S
BacklightMini-LED
Aspect Ratio16:9
Curved
Picture Quality
Color GamutQuantum Dot
Motion TechMotion Xcelerator 165Hz
ProcessorNQ8 AI Gen2 Processor
HDR
HDR FormatsHDR10, HDR10+, HLGHDR, Dolby Vision
Dolby Vision
HDR10+
HLG
Gaming
Refresh Rate120 Hz
VRRFreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
ALLM
Game Mode
Smart TV
PlatformTizenRoku TV
Voice AssistantAmazon Alexa, BixbyHands-Free Voice Controls
Screen MirroringApple AirPlay
Audio
Speaker Config4.4.2
Wattage70W
Dolby Atmos
Surround SoundObject Tracking Sound+
eARC
Connectivity
HDMI Ports4
HDMI Version2.1
USB Ports2
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.3
Ethernet
Optical Audio
VESA Mount400 x 300 mm
Power & Size
Power316W
Energy Star
Weight25.60 kg

Pros & Cons

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5"

  • Strong audio (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile

Roku 4802CA

  • Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong display (69th percentile)
  • Below average audio (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average gaming (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average smart (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (21th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5"

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 18 of 36 specs.

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5" Better at:

BudgetGamingMoviesSportsOutdoorPortableCorporateStreamingSmart Home