Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Razer
67 Overall Score
vs
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
ASUS
63 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Specifications
| Razer Blade Blade 14 | ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Processor (30MB Cache, 2.97GHz, 8 cores, 8 Threads); Qualcomm Hexagon NPU up to 45TOPS |
| Cores | 10★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 3.0 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | Qualcomm Adreno GPU |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 45% NTSC |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.63 kg★ | 1.88 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh★ | 50 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Pros & Cons
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average port (22th percentile)
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong ram (67th percentile)
- Below average compact (22th percentile)
Pricing
Razer Blade Blade 14 20250.022score per dollar
vs
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue0.081score per dollar
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue offers 3.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Razer Blade Blade 14
Scores 67 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.
