Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue

Kodak
43 Overall Score
vs
Adesso Moto Snap GOMS32G Black

Adesso Moto Snap GOMS32G Black

Adesso
24 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Kodak
51
Adesso
24
Beginner
Kodak
41
Adesso
22
Streaming
Kodak
34
Adesso
16
Sports Wildlife
Kodak
31
Adesso
25
Wedding Events
Kodak
30
Adesso
21
Video
Kodak
27
Adesso
19
Youtube
Kodak
26
Adesso
15
Product Photography
Kodak
25
Adesso
18
Vlogging
Kodak
24
Adesso
9
Photography
Kodak
23
Adesso
18

Specifications

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2Adesso Moto Snap GOMS32G
Sensor
TypeBSI-CMOSSony STARVIS
Size1/2.3-inch
Megapixels16 MP
ISO Range100
Autofocus
AF Points25
Eye AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)6 fps
Max Shutter1/2000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p1080p
1080p FPS30 fps
10-bit
RAW Video
CodecH.264/MOV
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.7"
Touchscreen
Articulating
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.18 kg
Battery Life2000 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB 2.0 micro-B
Hot Shoe

Pros & Cons

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue

  • Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (72th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average af (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

Adesso Moto Snap GOMS32G Black

  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2

Scores 43 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 10 of 25 specs.

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography