HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Touchscreen
HP
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Razer
67 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Compact
Creator
Entertainment
Student
Developer
Business
Spezifikationen
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Touchscreen | Razer Blade Blade 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U★ | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8 | 10★ |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz★ | 2.0 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | 780M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Keine Daten | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 512 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 14" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 2560 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 45% NTSC | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Number of Thunderbolt 4 Ports:2 | — |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI | — |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 6E★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.42 kg★ | 1.63 kg |
| Battery | 56 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Vor- & Nachteile
HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Touchscreen
- Strong ram (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong compact (77th percentile)
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average port (26th percentile)
Preise
HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Touchscreen
No current pricing available
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Fazit
Gewinner: HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Touchscreen
Scores 69 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.
