espresso espresso 15.6" Multi-Touch Display with Stand Review
The espresso portable touch monitor is easy to carry, but its slow screen and high price mean it's only for a very specific user.
The 30-Second Version
The espresso 15.6" Multi-Touch Display is a portable, touchscreen monitor that's easy to carry but slow to use. It's fine for adding a basic second screen to a laptop, but its performance and display quality are underwhelming for its $500 price.
Overview
If you're looking for a portable monitor to add a second screen to your laptop, the espresso 15.6" Multi-Touch Display is a straightforward option. It's a 15.6-inch, 1080p LCD panel that connects via USB-C, weighs just 800 grams, and includes a stand. It's designed for portability, not for high-end creative work or gaming. At around $500, it's priced as a premium portable monitor, so you're paying for the convenience of having a touchscreen display that's easy to carry.
Performance
Performance-wise, this is a basic 60Hz panel with a 10ms response time. In our database, that puts its performance score in the bottom 2% of all monitors we track. That means it's one of the slowest screens we've tested. For everyday tasks like browsing or document work, it's fine. But if you try to do anything involving fast motion, like scrolling through a timeline in a video editor or playing any game, you'll notice the lag. The 300-nit brightness and 16.7 million colors (8-bit) are about average for portable monitors, so it's a solid but unremarkable display.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Extremely compact and lightweight (800g) 100th
- Excellent connectivity with two USB-C ports 92th
- Includes a stand and is a true multi-touch display 71th
- Simple, plug-and-play setup for a second screen 71th
- Good for basic productivity on the go
Cons
- Very slow performance (60Hz, 10ms response) 2th
- Display quality is underwhelming (low brightness, basic colors) 15th
- Not suitable for gaming or fast-paced creative work 29th
- Ergonomics are mediocre (fixed stand design)
- Price is high for the specs you get
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 15.6" |
| Resolution | 1920 (Full HD) |
| Panel Type | LCD |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 10 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) |
Connectivity
| USB-C | 2 |
| Speakers | Yes |
Features
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Weight | 0.8 kg / 1.8 lbs |
Value & Pricing
At $500, the espresso display asks a lot for what it delivers. You're paying for the portability and touch functionality, not for screen quality. For the same money, you could buy a much better standard desktop monitor, or even a higher-quality portable screen from brands like ASUS or Lenovo that offer better color and brightness. This feels like a niche product for someone who specifically needs a touchscreen portable monitor and isn't worried about performance.
vs Competition
Let's compare it to some real alternatives. The ASUS ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT is a similar 15.6" portable touch monitor, often found for less money, and it typically has better color accuracy. If you don't need touch, the Lenovo ThinkVision M14d is a fantastic 14" portable monitor that's brighter, lighter, and cheaper. And if you're considering this for creative work, forget it. Our data shows it scores poorly for that use case. A standard Dell UltraSharp or even a good laptop screen will outperform it dramatically. The competitors listed in our data (like the Samsung Odyssey or MSI gaming monitors) are in a completely different league for performance, but they're not portable. This espresso sits in a weird middle ground.
| Spec | espresso espresso 15.6" Multi-Touch Display with Stand | Samsung Odyssey Samsung - 57" Odyssey Neo G9 Dual 4K UHD Quantum | LG UltraGear LG UltraGear 45" WUHD DUAL MODE 4K 165Hz FHD 330Hz | ASUS ROG Swift ASUS ROG Swift 32" 4K OLED Gaming Monitor PG32UCDP | MSI MAG MSI 32" UHD 4K 165Hz Nvidia G-Sync Compatible | BenQ MOBIUZ BenQ MOBIUZ EX271U 27" 4K HDR 165 Hz Gaming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 15.600000381469727 | 57 | 45 | 32 | 32 | 27 |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 7680 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | LCD | VA | OLED | OLED | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 | 240 | 165 | 240 | 165 | 165 |
| Response Time Ms | 10 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible | G-Sync Compatible | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium |
| Hdr | - | HDR10+ | HDR10 | HDR10 | HDR400 | HDR10 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Common Questions
Q: Is the espresso portable monitor good for gaming?
No, it's one of the worst monitors for gaming in our database. The 60Hz refresh rate and 10ms response time will feel very laggy.
Q: Can I use this espresso display for photo editing?
Not really. Its color performance is middle of the pack, and our scoring shows it's weak for creative work. You'd want a monitor with better color accuracy.
Q: How does the espresso compare to an ASUS portable monitor?
Similar ASUS models like the ZenScreen Touch often offer better color quality at a lower price. The espresso's main advantage is its two USB-C ports.
Q: Does the espresso portable monitor need a power adapter?
It likely powers and receives video through a single USB-C cable from your laptop, which is a nice feature for true portability.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're a gamer, a video editor, or anyone who needs a fast, high-quality display. Its performance scores are dead last for those uses. Also skip it if you're just looking for a cheap second screen. There are better-value portable monitors out there. If you need a great portable screen for creative work, look at options from ASUS or Lenovo that score higher in our creative category.
Verdict
Should you buy this? Only if your needs are very specific. If you absolutely require a portable, touchscreen second display for basic tasks like presentations or light document work, and you're willing to pay a premium for that convenience, it could work. But for almost everyone else, it's a pass. The performance is too slow, the display quality isn't great, and the price is steep. You can get better value and better screens elsewhere.