TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
77 综合评分
vs
Apple Bucephalus Wireless

Apple Bucephalus Wireless

Apple
32 综合评分

评分

Gaming
TOZO
75
Apple
22
Travel
TOZO
74
Apple
37
Fitness
TOZO
71
Apple
21
Budget
TOZO
67
Apple
31
Calls
TOZO
67
Apple
27
Commute
TOZO
66
Apple
35
Music
TOZO
65
Apple
25

规格

TOZO Crystal PodsApple Bucephalus Wireless
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACBucephalus Wireless Earbuds with ENC Noise Cancelling, Bluetooth 5.4 Ear Buds, 48H Playtime & Bass Stereo Sound for Sports/Working, Compatible with iPhone/Android, Pad - Ivory White
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs48 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

优缺点

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Apple Bucephalus Wireless

  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (70th percentile)
  • Below average mic (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average build (33th percentile)

结论

胜出: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 34 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness