Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Общая оценка
vs
Sony WF-1000XM4
Sony
29 Общая оценка
Оценки
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Характеристики
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Sony WF-1000XM4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 6 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 140 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | LDAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
Плюсы и минусы
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sony WF-1000XM4
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong anc (71th percentile)
- Strong mic (66th percentile)
- Below average comfort (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Вердикт
Победитель: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 38 specs.