Soundcore P31i
Soundcore
90 종합 점수
vs
Samsung EarFlowC Plus Palovue
Samsung
45 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Fitness
Travel
Gaming
Music
Commute
Calls
사양
| Soundcore P31i | Samsung EarFlowC Plus Palovue | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | magnetic |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | three different ear tips |
| Weight | 0.06 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic Driver | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 11 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 14.199999809265137 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB★ | 96 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | LDAC | — |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | — |
| Wired Connector | USB Type C | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 10 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 3 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 3.5 hours playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | intelligent voice wake up |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | soundcore | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | — |
장단점
Soundcore P31i
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
Samsung EarFlowC Plus Palovue
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong sound (74th percentile)
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
가격
Soundcore P31i1.494달러당 점수
vs
Samsung EarFlowC Plus Palovue2.839달러당 점수
Samsung EarFlowC Plus Palovue 1.9배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Soundcore P31i
Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 34 specs.
