Lenovo Tab M 9 TB310FU Tablet 9" HD MediaTek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 Octa-core Review

The Lenovo Tab M9 is the definition of a budget tablet, with a bad screen and sluggish performance that limit it to being a simple video player for travel.

CPU 2 GHz
RAM 4 GB
Storage 64 GB
Screen 9" 1340x800
OS Android 12
Stylus No
Cellular No
Lenovo Tab M 9 TB310FU Tablet 9" HD MediaTek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 Octa-core tablet
28.3 総合スコア

The 30-Second Version

The Lenovo Tab M9 is a bare-bones budget tablet for watching videos and nothing else. Its screen is one of the worst available, and performance is sluggish. At its normal $110 price, it's a cheap option for a single, simple task. Don't buy it for anything resembling real work or a good viewing experience.

Overview

Let's be real from the start. The Lenovo Tab M9 is not a tablet for power users, students juggling ten apps, or anyone who needs a sharp screen. It's a simple, affordable device for one job: basic media consumption on the go. Think of it as a dedicated YouTube and Netflix machine you can toss in a bag without worrying about it.

Our database puts its overall score at a 28.3 out of 100, which is about what you'd expect. It's squarely in the 'budget' category. The interesting part isn't the specs, which are all pretty middle-of-the-road or worse. It's the price spread. This thing can be found for as low as $110, but some vendors are listing it for over $25,000. That's not a typo. We'll get into that wild pricing in a bit.

If you need a tablet for checking email, watching videos on a plane, or keeping a kid occupied for a few hours, this could fit the bill. But if you're hoping for a snappy, modern Android experience or a good screen for reading, you'll want to look elsewhere. This is about managing expectations.

Performance

Performance is exactly what the specs suggest: fine for light tasks, frustrating for anything more. The MediaTek Helio G80 chip and 4GB of RAM land in the 44th and 38th percentiles, respectively. In plain English, that means it's slower than most tablets out there. It'll open a web page or a streaming app without too much fuss, but try switching between apps or loading a complex site and you'll feel the lag.

The screen is the real weak spot, scoring in the 8th percentile. That 9-inch, 1340x800 panel is a letdown. It's not very bright, colors look washed out, and the resolution is low enough that text can look a bit fuzzy. For watching movies, it's passable if you're not picky. For reading or browsing, it's a compromise. The other components, like the WiFi 5 connectivity and the 64GB storage, are just average. Nothing stands out, but nothing is catastrophically bad either, except for that display.

Performance Percentiles

CPU 44.1
GPU 45.8
RAM 37.6
Screen 7.7
Battery 46.1
Feature 53.2
Storage 31.4
Connectivity 54.2
Social Proof 31.7

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely low entry price at around $110 makes it one of the cheapest new tablets available.
  • Lightweight and portable at 346 grams, easy to hold for long video sessions.
  • Clean software experience, as Lenovo doesn't overload it with bloatware.
  • Battery life is about average for the category, good enough for a few hours of video playback.
  • Includes support for expandable storage via microSD, which helps offset the limited 64GB internal space.

Cons

  • The screen quality is among the worst we've seen, with poor resolution and dull colors. 8th
  • Performance is sluggish for multitasking; 4GB of RAM is a real bottleneck in 2025. 31th
  • Comes with the now-outdated Android 12, with no guarantee of meaningful updates. 32th
  • Build quality feels cheap and plasticky, not built to last.
  • Cameras are strictly for video calls in a pinch; the 8MP rear sensor takes muddy photos.

The Word on the Street

4.4/5 (7 reviews)
👍 Owners who use it strictly as a portable media player for travel are satisfied, praising its clear enough screen and sound for movies.
👍 Several users appreciate the clean, bloatware-free Android software experience compared to other budget brands.
👎 A common complaint is that performance is misleadingly advertised; it feels slow and is not suitable as a primary device.
🤔 Reviews are polarized between users happy with it for occasional, lightweight use and those disappointed by its limitations for anything more demanding.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

CPU 2 GHz
GPU Mali-G52 MC2

Memory & Storage

RAM 4 GB
Storage 64 GB

Display

Size 9"
Resolution 1340

Connectivity

Wi-Fi WiFi 5

Physical

Weight 0.3 kg / 0.8 lbs
OS Android 12

Value & Pricing

The value story here is bizarre. At its normal street price of around $110, the Tab M9 is a straightforward, no-frills budget option. You're paying for a functional media player and little else. Compared to other tablets at this price, it's about average. You might find slightly better screens or performance from off-brand Chinese tablets, but Lenovo's name offers a bit more peace of mind for warranty support.

Now, about that $25,787 listing. That's clearly an algorithmic error or a placeholder from a third-party seller. No one should ever pay that. It completely distorts the value conversation. The real discussion starts and ends in the $100-$150 range. At that price, you accept the major trade-offs.

$110

vs Competition

Stacked against its peers, the Tab M9's role is clear. The Apple iPad (even an older model) and Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ run circles around it in performance, screen quality, and software support, but they cost three to five times as much. They're in a different league entirely.

A more direct competitor might be something like the Teclast T65PLUS. That tablet offers a much larger and likely better 13.4-inch screen and a newer Android version for a similar budget price. The trade-off is that Teclast is a less-known brand with potentially spotty long-term support. The Nexall N90 is another budget Android option. The choice here is between Lenovo's brand reliability with terrible specs, or a no-name brand with better specs but more uncertainty.

Spec Lenovo Tab M 9 TB310FU Tablet 9" HD MediaTek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 Octa-core Apple iPad Apple - 11-inch iPad A16 chip with Wi-Fi - 128GB - Microsoft Surface Pro Microsoft Surface Pro 6 (Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, Samsung Galaxy Tab S Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ X800 12.4" 256GB Wi-Fi with Teclast TECLAST T65PLUS 13.4-Inch Android 15 Tablet 2025, Nexall N90 N90 Android 16 Tablet, 12 inch Tablet 2K FHD+,
CPU 2 GHz Apple A16 Core i7 2.5 GHz 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
RAM (GB) 4 6 16 8 8 24
Storage (GB) 64 128 256 256 256 128
Screen 9" 1340x800 11" 2360x1640 12.3" 2736x1824 12.4" 2800x1752 13.4" 1920x1200 12"
OS Android 12 iPadOS Windows 11 Home Android Android 15 Android 16
Stylus false true true true false true
Cellular false false false false true true
Battery (Wh) - 29 - - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product CpuGpuRamScreenBatteryFeatureStorageConnectivitySocial Proof
Lenovo Tab M 9 TB310FU Tablet 9" HD MediaTek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 Octa-core 44.145.837.67.746.153.231.454.231.7
Apple iPad 11-inch A16 chip Compare 72.172.76679.196.693.255.889.699.2
Microsoft Surface Pro 6 Compare 90.789.790.883.446.190.184.654.289.6
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8+ X800 12.4" Compare 78.478.674.992.646.190.174.774.292.5
Teclast T65PLUS 13.4-Inch Android 15 Tablet 2025 Compare 74.575.174.945.294.524.474.792.695
Nexall N90 N90 Android 16 Compare 76.376.796.328.146.179.455.892.654.8

Common Questions

Q: Is the Lenovo Tab M9 good for reading books and browsing the web?

Not really. The screen's low resolution (1340x800) makes text look fuzzy and pixelated, which is tiring on the eyes for reading. Combined with only 4GB of RAM, browsing with multiple tabs will feel slow and janky. It's a poor choice for these tasks.

Q: Can this tablet handle video calls on Zoom or Google Meet?

It can, but don't expect it to be great. The front-facing camera is basic, and the MediaTek G80 processor might struggle if you have other apps open. For quick family calls it's fine, but for important meetings or regular use, you'd want something more capable.

Q: Why are some sellers listing this for over $25,000?

That's almost certainly a glitch or a placeholder price from a third-party marketplace seller. The actual market value for this tablet is between $110 and $150. Never pay anything close to the high price; it's not reflective of the product's worth.

Q: How does the battery life hold up for watching movies?

Battery performance is about average, ranking in the 46th percentile. You can expect around 6-8 hours of continuous video playback on a charge, which is enough for a long flight or a day of casual use. It's not a standout, but it's not a disaster either.

Who Should Skip This

Students should steer clear. Our scoring gives it a 23.7 for student use and a dismal 18.5 for productivity. Trying to research with multiple browser tabs, use a word processor, or run educational apps will be a lesson in frustration due to the limited RAM and slow chip. Anyone who needs a sharp screen for digital art, reading comics, or editing photos should also skip it; the display is a major weakness. If you fall into these camps, look at refurbished iPads or the base model Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+. They cost a bit more but offer a massively better experience for work and content creation.

Verdict

Buy the Lenovo Tab M9 if you need a dedicated, disposable video player for travel, or a first tablet for a very young child where you don't care if it gets broken. Its job is to stream video and browse simple websites, and it can do that as long as you have low expectations for speed and visual quality.

Skip it entirely if you plan to use this for schoolwork, productivity, reading, or as your main device for web browsing. The weak screen and limited RAM will frustrate you quickly. For those uses, even spending $50-$100 more on a used older-generation iPad or a Samsung Galaxy Tab A series would be a dramatically better experience. This tablet knows its lane, and that lane is very, very narrow.