AOC AGON Q27G4ZD

AOC AGON Q27G4ZD

AOC
32 Overall Score
vs
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue

ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue

ASUS
63 Overall Score

Scores

Developer
AOC
31
ASUS
66
Entertainment
AOC
43
ASUS
63
Student
AOC
30
ASUS
60
Business
AOC
30
ASUS
60
Compact
AOC
20
ASUS
48
Creator
AOC
15
ASUS
31
Gaming
AOC
9
ASUS
16

Specifications

AOC AGON Q27G4ZDASUS Vivobook 16" X1607
Processor
CPUIntel Core 7 240HQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Processor (30MB Cache, 2.97GHz, 8 cores, 8 Threads); Qualcomm Hexagon NPU up to 45TOPS
CPU Multi-Core Score
24,718
No data
Cores108
Frequency2.5 GHz3.0 GHz
L3 Cache24 MB
Graphics
GPUQualcomm Adreno GPU
GPU Benchmark Score59
Typeintegrated
VRAM TypeShared
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage 1512 GB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD
Display
Size16"
Resolution1920 px
PanelOLEDIPS
Refresh Rate240 Hz60 Hz
Brightness300 nits
Color Gamut110.2% DCI-P3, 147.6% sRGB45% NTSC
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports2
HDMIHDMI 2.0 x2HDMI 2.1
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
Physical
Weight6.60 kg1.88 kg
Battery50 Wh
OSWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

AOC AGON Q27G4ZD

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong cpu (77th percentile)
  • Strong screen (76th percentile)
  • Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average compact (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average port (12th percentile)12th %ile

ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue

  • Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong ram (67th percentile)
  • Below average compact (22th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607

Scores 63 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 27 specs.

ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Better at:

GamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment