Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD

Tamron
96 综合评分
vs
Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift

Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift

Canon
72 综合评分

评分

Budget
Tamron
100
Canon
63
Video Cinema
Tamron
84
Canon
58
Professional
Tamron
83
Canon
56
Macro
Tamron
83
Canon
79
Landscape
Tamron
79
Canon
52
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
73
Canon
50
Travel
Tamron
72
Canon
38
Portrait
Tamron
71
Canon
62
Street
Tamron
66
Canon
50

规格

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXDCanon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift
Optics
TypeZoomMacro
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm50 mm
Elements1612
Groups129
CoatingAir Sphere and Subwavelength Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/16f/32
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFUJIFILM XCanon EF
FormatAPS-CFull-Frame
Weight0.54 kg0.94 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm270 mm
Max Magnification1:4.71:2

优缺点

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD

  • Strong versatility (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile

Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift

  • Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (73th percentile)
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile

价格

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD is CA$2,333 cheaper (3.1x less).

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD0.088每美元得分
vs
Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift0.021每美元得分

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD 性价比高 4.2 倍

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD

Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift

结论

胜出: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 18 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑