Apple MacBook Pro 14"
Apple
98 综合评分
vs
Acer Swift Go 16 16.0" Touchscreen Ultra 7 155H
Acer
68 综合评分
评分
Entertainment
Student
Compact
Business
Developer
Creator
Gaming
规格
| Apple MacBook Pro 14" | Acer Swift Go 16 16.0" Touchscreen Ultra 7 155H | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Apple M5 ★ | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 10 | 16★ |
| Frequency | — | 1.4 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Apple (10-Core) | Arc Graphics★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 无数据 | |
| Type | — | integrated★ |
| VRAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 24 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | — | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 4 TB★ | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14.2" | 16" |
| Resolution | 3024 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | Mini-LED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 1000 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | 2 x USB Type-C Ports - supporting USB4 (up to 40 Gbps), Thunderbolt 4 & USB Charging & Power Delivery (Up to 100W) |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI Output | 1 x HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 6E | WiFi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.50 kg★ | 1.60 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh★ | — |
| OS | macOS | Windows 11 Home |
优缺点
Apple MacBook Pro 14"
- Strong storage (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong screen (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong reliability (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average gpu (20th percentile)20th %ile
Acer Swift Go 16 16.0" Touchscreen Ultra 7 155H
- Strong storage (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong cpu (77th percentile)
- Strong port (68th percentile)
- Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average compact (32th percentile)
价格
Apple MacBook Pro 14"0.023每美元得分
vs
Acer Swift Go 16 16.0" Touchscreen Ultra 7 155H0.027每美元得分
Acer Swift Go 16 16.0" Touchscreen Ultra 7 155H 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: Apple MacBook Pro 14"
Scores 98 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.
