Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black, Silver, Dual Color 2025
Dell
88 Pontuação geral
vs
AOC Gaming Q27G4XN 27" Black/Red
AOC
72 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Especificações
| Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" | AOC Gaming Q27G4XN 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 600 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB | NTSC (CIE1976): 111.4%, sRGB (CIE1931): 124.7% |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR | HDR Ready |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | — |
| Power | 31W★ | 54W |
| Weight | 7.06 kg | 5.11 kg★ |
Prós e Contras
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black, Silver, Dual Color 2025
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
AOC Gaming Q27G4XN 27" Black/Red
- Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong performance (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (72th percentile)
- Below average compact (16th percentile)16th %ile
Preços
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black, Silver, Dual Color 20250.057pontos por dólar
vs
AOC Gaming Q27G4XN 27" Black/Red0.321pontos por dólar
AOC Gaming Q27G4XN 27" Black/Red oferece 5.6x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5"
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 29 specs.
