Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S.
Panasonic
75 Pontuação geral
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Tamron
96 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Portrait
Street
Especificações
| Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Macro | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 16 |
| Groups | 13 | 12 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/32 | f/16 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | FUJIFILM X |
| Format | Full-Frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:2 | 1:4.7 |
Prós e Contras
Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S.
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong macro (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
- Below average aperture (30th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
- Strong versatility (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
Preços
Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S.0.055pontos por dólar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD0.088pontos por dólar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD oferece 1.6x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 17 specs.
