Yongnuo Yongnuo YN 17mm f/1.7M Lens (Micro Four Thirds) Review
The Yongnuo 17mm f/1.7 packs a bright f/1.7 aperture and surprisingly good build into a tiny, $178 package for MFT cameras. Just don't expect lightning-fast autofocus.
The 30-Second Version
The Yongnuo 17mm f/1.7 is a shockingly well-built, super-bright prime lens for Micro Four Thirds that costs under $180. Its f/1.7 aperture is great for low light, and it's tiny enough to live on your camera. Just know the autofocus is just okay, and there's no stabilization. If you want maximum aperture for minimum cash and can live with the quirks, it's a fantastic deal.
Overview
Let's talk about the Yongnuo 17mm f/1.7. It's a weird little lens. On one hand, it's a super compact, bright prime for Micro Four Thirds that costs less than a nice dinner for two. On the other, it's from a brand most people know for flashes, not lenses, and it's trying to compete in a space where Panasonic and Olympus have already set a high bar. This isn't your typical first-party glass, and that's exactly what makes it interesting.
If you're a Micro Four Thirds shooter looking for a lightweight, fast prime for street photography or casual use, this lens is squarely in your sights. Our database scores it at 70.2/100 for street, which is solid for its price point. The 17mm focal length gives you a 34mm equivalent field of view, which is a classic 'walkaround' perspective. It's the kind of lens you slap on your camera when you're heading out the door and don't want to think too much.
What's fascinating here is the value proposition. For $178, you're getting an f/1.7 aperture, which lands in the 80th percentile for brightness. That's a lot of light-gathering power for not a lot of cash. The build quality, surprisingly, scores in the 94th percentile. So while it's light at 179 grams, it doesn't feel like a toy. This lens is a bet that you'll trade a bit of polish and brand recognition for sheer performance-per-dollar.
Performance
The numbers tell a straightforward story. That f/1.7 aperture is the star of the show. It lets you shoot in lower light without cranking the ISO, and it gives you decent background separation. Our optical score puts it in the 69th percentile, which is respectable. You'll get sharp enough results in the center, especially stopped down a bit, but don't expect pro-level corner-to-corner sharpness wide open. The bokeh quality scores a 73, which is fine for a wide-angle lens—it's more about subject isolation than creamy backgrounds.
Where the performance gets a bit rough is in the autofocus. It lands in the 46th percentile. It uses an STM motor, which is generally quiet, but it's not the fastest or most confident hunter in low-contrast situations. There's no image stabilization either (37th percentile), so if your camera body lacks IBIS, you'll need steady hands or good light to keep shots sharp. The macro capability, at a 76th percentile score and a 1:6.67 magnification ratio, is a nice bonus for getting a little closer to your subject, but it's not a true macro lens.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Incredible value for a fast prime. At $178, an f/1.7 aperture is almost unheard of. 94th
- Excellent, dense build quality. The 94th percentile score means it feels solid and well-made in hand. 81th
- Very compact and lightweight at 179g. It's a perfect 'always-on' lens for a small MFT camera. 78th
- The f/1.7 aperture provides great low-light capability and pleasant subject separation for a wide angle. 74th
- Surprisingly decent close-focus ability for a non-macro lens, with a 1:6.67 magnification ratio.
Cons
- Autofocus is merely adequate. It's in the 46th percentile, so expect some hunting, especially in low light. 5th
- No image stabilization. You're relying entirely on your camera body's IBIS, if it has any.
- Brand recognition is low (7th percentile social proof). Resale value and community support may be limited.
- Optical performance is good, not great (69th percentile). You might see some softness in the corners wide open.
- Versatility score is low (39th percentile). It's a one-trick pony—a 34mm equivalent prime, and that's it.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 17 |
| Focal Length Max | 17 |
| Elements | 10 |
| Groups | 9 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | Micro Four Thirds |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.4 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 52 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 180 |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.67 |
Value & Pricing
Here's the bottom line: for $178, this lens is a steal if your priorities are aperture and portability. You're getting 80th percentile light-gathering power for less than half the price of many first-party alternatives. The build quality is a fantastic bonus at this price point.
That said, you are making trade-offs. You're sacrificing some autofocus speed, optical polish, and the peace of mind that comes with a major brand. If your budget is tight and you want to shoot in a variety of lighting conditions without breaking the bank, this lens makes a ton of sense. If you have another $100-$150 to spend, you might find a used Panasonic or Olympus lens with more refined performance.
Price History
vs Competition
The most direct competitor is arguably the used market for the Panasonic Lumix 20mm f/1.7 II. That's a legendary pancake lens with sharper optics and better brand cachet, but it's slower to focus and often costs $50-$100 more used. The Yongnuo gives you a slightly wider field of view and, on paper, faster AF (though real-world results may vary).
Looking beyond MFT, the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 for Z-mount is a similar third-party, value-focused prime, but for a different system. The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony E is a zoom that offers way more versatility and stabilization, but it's bigger, heavier, and more expensive. The Yongnuo's play is pure simplicity and low cost. It's not trying to be an all-in-one zoom; it's a tiny, bright window you can throw in your bag and forget about.
| Spec | Yongnuo Yongnuo YN 17mm f/1.7M Lens (Micro Four Thirds) | Meike Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame AF STM Lens Standard | Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z) | Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens | Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony | Sigma Sigma Contemporary Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Lens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 17mm | 50mm | 24-70mm | 24mm | 17-70mm | 16-300mm |
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Nikon Z | Nikon Z | Canon RF | Sony E Mount | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | true | false | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 179 | 301 | 676 | 269 | 544 | 615 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM | Autofocus | Autofocus | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Lens Type | - | - | Zoom | Zoom | Zoom | Zoom |
Common Questions
Q: How does the image quality compare to a Panasonic or Olympus 17mm f/1.8?
Our optical score puts the Yongnuo in the 69th percentile, which is good but not class-leading. First-party lenses from Panasonic or Olympus will typically have better corner sharpness, less chromatic aberration, and more consistent performance wide open. For the price, the Yongnuo holds its own in the center of the frame, especially stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4.
Q: Is the autofocus fast and quiet enough for video?
The STM motor is quiet, which is good for video. However, with an AF score in the 46th percentile, it's not the fastest or most confident. It may hunt during continuous autofocus, especially in challenging light. For static shots or manual focus pulls, it's fine, but we wouldn't rely on it for critical, run-and-gun video work.
Q: Can I use this for portraits?
Our database gives it a 67.5/100 for portraits. The 34mm equivalent focal length is wider than a traditional portrait lens, so you'll need to get close to your subject for framing, which can introduce some perspective distortion. The f/1.7 aperture provides nice separation, but the bokeh (73rd percentile) won't be as smooth as a longer lens. It's best for environmental portraits or full-body shots.
Q: Is there any weather sealing?
No, the lens is not weather-sealed. You'll want to be careful using it in rain, dust, or extreme conditions. Keep that in mind if you're pairing it with a weather-sealed camera body—the lens becomes the weak point.
Who Should Skip This
Professional photographers who rely on flawless autofocus tracking and ultimate optical performance should look elsewhere. The AF hiccups and good-but-not-great optics mean this isn't a tool for paid gigs where consistency is key. Similarly, videographers who need silent, reliable continuous autofocus should consider a first-party lens with better video-specific features.
If you're a beginner who thinks you might outgrow the lens quickly, or if you're not sure you like the 34mm equivalent field of view, you might be better off with a used standard zoom first. That'll give you more flexibility to figure out what focal lengths you actually enjoy shooting. Also, if you absolutely need image stabilization and your camera body doesn't have IBIS, this lens will limit your handheld shooting too much.
Verdict
Buy the Yongnuo 17mm f/1.7 if you're a Micro Four Thirds user on a strict budget who craves a fast aperture for low-light street photography or casual shooting. It's perfect for someone with a camera like an OM System OM-5 or a Panasonic GX85 who wants to keep their kit light and affordable. The combination of f/1.7, solid build, and a sub-$200 price tag is genuinely compelling.
Skip it if you need reliable, fast autofocus for moving subjects, or if you shoot a lot of video where silent, smooth focusing is critical. Also, if you don't have in-body stabilization in your camera, the lack of lens-based IS might be a deal-breaker for handheld shooting in anything but good light. In those cases, saving up for a used first-party lens with IS or better AF is the wiser move.