Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2 Review

The Mitakon Zhongyi 85mm f/1.2 delivers stunning f/1.2 bokeh for under $500, but it demands you master manual focus. Is this niche portrait lens a hidden gem or too much hassle?

Focal Length 85mm
Max Aperture f/1.2
Mount Nikon F
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 921 g
Lens Type Telephoto
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2 lens
49.3 Totaalscore

The 30-Second Version

The Mitakon Zhongyi 85mm f/1.2 is a niche powerhouse for bokeh lovers. Its f/1.2 aperture creates stunning background blur at a price that undercuts major brands by hundreds. The catch is it's manual focus only, heavy, and not for fast-paced shooting. If you want that classic portrait look and don't mind working for it, this lens is a steal. If you need autofocus, look elsewhere.

Overview

If you're looking at the Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2, you're probably chasing one thing: that creamy, dreamy, f/1.2 bokeh without spending a fortune on a first-party lens. This is a manual focus prime that's built like a tank, weighs nearly a kilogram, and is designed for photographers and videographers who want to slow down and control every aspect of the shot. It's not a lens for run-and-gun situations or beginners, but for a specific creative niche.

This lens lands squarely in the portrait specialist category, scoring a 74.8 out of 100 in our database. That's its sweet spot. The f/1.2 aperture puts it in the 96th percentile for light-gathering ability, which means you can shoot in dim conditions and get that beautiful subject separation. It's also surprisingly decent for video, scoring a 52.5, thanks to features like a de-clicked aperture ring and a long focus throw.

What makes it interesting is the value proposition. For $499, you're getting an f/1.2 aperture on a full-frame lens. That's a spec you'd typically pay over a thousand dollars for from Nikon or Sigma. The trade-off is you're giving up autofocus, image stabilization, and any kind of weather sealing. This lens is a pure optical tool, and you have to be the brains behind the operation.

Performance

Let's talk about what that f/1.2 aperture actually gets you. In our percentile rankings, its bokeh quality sits in the 96th percentile. That's elite territory. The 11-blade rounded diaphragm helps create smooth, circular out-of-focus highlights, which is exactly what portrait shooters want. The optical performance score is a more modest 64th percentile, which tells us the sharpness is good, especially for the price, but don't expect it to match the clinical perfection of a $2000 Zeiss Otus wide open.

The real-world implication is a specific look. You can shoot portraits with a razor-thin depth of field, making your subject pop against a beautifully blurred background. The manual focus, while a challenge for some, gives you pinpoint control over exactly where that sliver of sharpness falls. For video, that long focus throw is a blessing, allowing for smooth, cinematic rack focuses. Just know that at f/1.2, nailing focus is critical, and there's no electronic assist to help you.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 96.7
Build 18.8
Macro 48.1
Optical 64
Aperture 95.9
Versatility 37.5
Social Proof 15.5
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Elite-level bokeh (96th percentile) creates stunning, creamy background blur perfect for portraits. 97th
  • Massive f/1.2 aperture (96th percentile) for exceptional low-light performance and extreme subject isolation. 96th
  • Outstanding build quality with an all-metal barrel that feels durable and premium in the hand.
  • Great value at $499, offering an f/1.2 experience at a fraction of the cost of first-party alternatives.
  • De-clicked aperture ring and long focus throw make it a surprisingly capable tool for videographers.

Cons

  • Manual focus only (AF percentile: 46th), which will be a deal-breaker for action or casual photography. 16th
  • No image stabilization (38th percentile), so handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds is more challenging. 19th
  • Heavy and bulky at 921g (over 2 lbs), making it a poor travel companion (travel score: 19.4/100).
  • No weather sealing (build percentile: 21st), so you can't confidently use it in rain or dusty conditions.
  • Very low social proof score (6th percentile), meaning it's a niche product with few user reviews to go on.

The Word on the Street

0.0/5 (3 reviews)
👍 Users are consistently blown away by the optical quality and build for the price, often comparing the bokeh and sharpness to lenses costing two or three times as much.
🤔 The manual focus is praised by videographers for its smooth, long throw perfect for rack focusing, but photographers note it can be slow and challenging for capturing spontaneous moments.
👎 The significant weight and bulk of the lens is a common complaint, with owners mentioning it makes handheld shooting tiring and the kit unbalanced on smaller camera bodies.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Telephoto
Focal Length Min 85
Focal Length Max 85
Elements 9
Groups 6

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.2
Min Aperture f/16
Diaphragm Blades 11

Build

Mount Nikon F
Format Full-Frame
Weight 0.9 kg / 2.0 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 1000

Value & Pricing

At $499, the Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster is playing in a different league than its direct spec competitors. A native Nikon Z 85mm f/1.8 S costs more and is 'only' f/1.8. To get a native f/1.2 from Nikon, you're looking at the $800+ range for the older F-mount version, and even more for the new Z-mount version. This lens undercuts that by a huge margin.

You're absolutely paying for the aperture and build with your money, and sacrificing convenience features. It's a classic price-to-performance trade. If the ultimate rendering and bokeh are your top priorities, and you're willing to work manually, this lens delivers a look that's usually much more expensive.

C$ 685

vs Competition

The most obvious competitor is the Viltrox 85mm f/1.8 AF lens, if you can find one for Nikon F. It's cheaper, has autofocus, and is lighter. But you lose that magical f/1.2 aperture and the buttery manual focus feel. For portrait purists, that's a big sacrifice.

If you're looking within the manual focus niche, lenses from brands like Samyang/Rokinon are worth a look. Their 85mm f/1.4 is often cheaper and lighter, but again, you're stepping down to f/1.4. The Mitakon's f/1.2 is its raison d'être. For video, the de-clicked aperture gives it an edge over many photo-centric manual lenses. Compared to the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 (a lens for crop-sensor cameras), you're looking at completely different tools—one is a versatile zoom, the other is a specialized prime. They solve different problems.

Spec Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2 Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus
Focal Length 85mm 55mm 35mm 17-70mm 24mm -
Max Aperture f/1.2 f/1.4 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/1.4
Mount Nikon F Nikon Z Fujifilm X Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M Canon RF Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false true
Weight (g) 921 281 400 544 272 320
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus Autofocus STM
Lens Type Telephoto - - Wide-Angle Zoom Wide-Angle -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2 46.496.718.848.16495.937.515.537.9
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.189.167.588.137.589.987.8
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.493.27480.537.595.187.8
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare 46.459.264.377.490.854.692.595.187.8
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.68182.575.837.59899.9
Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare 95.681.888.885.334.688.137.586.787.8

Common Questions

Q: Is the manual focus hard to use?

It depends on your subject. The focus throw is long and smooth, which is great for precise control in portraits or video. But for fast-moving subjects, it's very challenging. Using focus peaking or magnification on your camera is essential. It scores in the 46th percentile for AF, which basically means it's average for a manual lens, but far behind any autofocus option.

Q: How sharp is it wide open at f/1.2?

Our optical score puts it in the 64th percentile, which is good, not exceptional. You can expect very good center sharpness at f/1.2, especially for portraits where absolute corner sharpness is less critical. Stopping down to f/2 or f/2.8 will yield excellent sharpness across the frame. It's sharp enough to create professional work, but it won't match the edge-to-edge perfection of a top-tier Zeiss or Sigma Art lens.

Q: Is it good for video?

Yes, its features are video-friendly. The de-clicked aperture ring lets you adjust exposure silently during a shot, and the long, damped focus throw is ideal for smooth manual pulls. The lack of stabilization means you'll want a gimbal or tripod for the steadiest footage. Its video score of 52.5/100 reflects this capable-but-specialized nature.

Q: Why is it so heavy?

The weight (921g) comes from the all-metal construction and the large glass elements required for the f/1.2 aperture. It's built like a classic manual lens from the film era. This gives it a premium, durable feel but makes it impractical for all-day handheld use or travel. Its abysmal 19.4/100 travel score tells the whole story here.

Who Should Skip This

Event and wedding photographers should steer clear. Manual focus in fast-paced, unpredictable environments is a recipe for missed crucial moments. You need the reliability of autofocus. Similarly, parents trying to photograph their kids or anyone shooting sports or wildlife will find this lens frustratingly slow.

Travel and street photographers should also skip it. With a travel score of 19.4/100, it's one of the worst lenses in our database for that job. It's too heavy, not versatile (it's just an 85mm), and draws attention. For these shooters, a lightweight prime with autofocus (like a 35mm or 50mm) or a compact zoom is a far better fit. If you crave bokeh but need portability, look at the much lighter Nikon 85mm f/1.8G instead.

Verdict

Buy this lens if you shoot portraits or creative video and you value ultimate bokeh and low-light capability over autofocus. It's for the photographer who doesn't mind slowing down, using focus peaking or magnification, and crafting a shot deliberately. The image quality you can get for $499 is genuinely impressive.

Skip it entirely if you shoot weddings, events, kids, or pets where fast, reliable autofocus is non-negotiable. The manual focus will frustrate you and cause you to miss shots. Also, avoid it if you're a travel photographer; its weight and lack of versatility make it an anchor in your bag. For those users, a used Nikon 85mm f/1.8G with autofocus is a much more practical choice.