Samsung Galaxy A17 SM-A176WZKAXAC Black 128GB
Samsung
23 종합 점수
vs
Google Pixel Pixel 10a Obsidian 128GB
Google
90 종합 점수
점수
Battery Life
Budget
Gaming
Foldable
Business
Rugged
Flagship
Compact
Photography
사양
| Samsung Galaxy A17 SM-A176WZKAXAC | Google Pixel Pixel 10a | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Display Type | — | OLED★ |
| Resolution | — | 1080 x 2424 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 3000 nits★ |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | — | 3.1 GHz |
| Processor Model | — | Google Tensor G4 |
| CPU Speed | — | 3.10★ |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Expandable | — | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | — | 48 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 3★ | 2 |
| Ultrawide | — | 13 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Video | — | 4K★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | — | 5,100 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | — | 30W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 0 |
| Connector | — | USB-C★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6 |
| NFC | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| eSIM | — | ✓★ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Yes |
| Face Recognition | — | ✓★ |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Samsung Galaxy A17 SM-A176WZKAXAC Black 128GB
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average battery (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average feature (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average performance (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
Google Pixel Pixel 10a Obsidian 128GB
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong battery (90th percentile)90th %ile
가격
Samsung Galaxy A17 SM-A176WZKAXAC Black 128GB
Google Pixel Pixel 10a Obsidian 128GB
결론
승자: Google Pixel Pixel 10a
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 20 of 37 specs.
