ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607 Quiet Blue
ASUS
55 종합 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
Apple
100 종합 점수
점수
Business
Student
Entertainment
Developer
Compact
Creator
Gaming
사양
| ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607 | Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | Apple M4 Max★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cores | 8 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics★ | Apple (40-Core) |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Type | discrete | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 64 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 8 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 16" | 14.2" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 3024 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | Mini-LED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 45% NTSC | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.88 kg | 1.60 kg★ |
| Battery | 42 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | macOS |
장단점
ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607 Quiet Blue
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong cpu (74th percentile)
- Strong gpu (70th percentile)
- Strong port (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average compact (23th percentile)
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
- Strong storage (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ram (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
가격
ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607 Quiet Blue0.045달러당 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 20240.012달러당 점수
ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607 Quiet Blue 3.8배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.