HP ProBook 14" 4 G1q Pike Silver 2025
HP
61 종합 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
Apple
100 종합 점수
점수
Business
Student
Entertainment
Developer
Compact
Creator
Gaming
사양
| HP ProBook 14" 4 G1q | Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | Apple M4 Max★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 3.0 GHz★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno★ | Apple (40-Core) |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 59★ | — |
| Type | integrated★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 8 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 14.2" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 3024 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | Mini-LED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 62.5% sRGB | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.46 kg★ | 1.60 kg |
| Battery | 56 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | macOS |
장단점
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1q Pike Silver 2025
- Strong ram (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Strong compact (75th percentile)
- Below average cpu (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
- Strong storage (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ram (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average gpu (19th percentile)19th %ile
가격
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1q Pike Silver 20250.043달러당 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 20240.012달러당 점수
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1q Pike Silver 2025 3.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 29 specs.