Samsung MAS CARNEY Wired
Samsung
35 종합 점수
vs
Sony WI-C100
Sony
80 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
Gaming
사양
| Samsung MAS CARNEY Wired | Sony WI-C100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | neckband |
| Ear Tips | — | Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | 0.02 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 9 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 120 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | MAS CARNEY Wired Earbuds with 3.5mm AUX Plug, in-Ear Headphones with Mic & In-Line Control, Zero-Latency Audio for Samsung, iPhone, Gaming, Travel, Work & Study, Laptop, Smartphone - AUX Wired Earbuds | Sony WI-C100 Wireless In-Ear Headphones, Black |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| Transparency | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | Bluetooth 5 |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 25 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 0.16699999570846558 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 1 hour playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 25 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | Sony Headphones Connect |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
장단점
Samsung MAS CARNEY Wired
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
- Below average mic (35th percentile)
Sony WI-C100
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (73th percentile)
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
가격
Samsung MAS CARNEY Wired3.534달러당 점수
vs
Sony WI-C1002.006달러당 점수
Samsung MAS CARNEY Wired 1.8배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony WI-C100
Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 33 specs.
